Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 3.5.2, the RC2 builds now start to be
available on pre-releases.
Did anyone verify that the version info is updated (re the secunia
reports problem)
http://ask.libreoffice.org/question/1459/secunia-psi-reports-insecure
also on the mailinglists)
i.e. version info of soffice.exe, not the one in the about dialog.
ciao
Christian
Pedro Lino píše v Čt 29. 03. 2012 v 19:06 +0100:
Hi all,
Did anyone verify that the version info is updated (re the
secunia
reports problem)
I think Secunia has already fixed the numbering so that the warning it
gone for version 3.5.1.But the Version number in the file Properties for 3.5.2rc2 is now
3.5.0.202 instead of 3.5.2.2Unless there is an rc3 and this is fixed meanwhile LO is going to get
a bad image with Secunia (and all the security minded people)
Why could it cause bad image? IMHO, it was bug on the Secunia side and
it is fixed now. We used this version scheme also for LO-3.4 and nobody
complained.
Personally I couldn't care less about Secunia but since it only takes
a small number change, I think it would be worth the effort
It looks trivial but it is not. We would need to do clean build for all
systems, upload them to mirrors, restart smoketests, ... So, this change
would delay the release by many days.
Also, it is potentially dangerous. The version is defined and used on
many locations. Any change could cause strange side effects. Also there
are many scripts around that depends on a certain version scheme. So, we
should not change this between rc2 and rc3 if there is not a big reason.
Well, I agree that 3.5.0.202 is ugly. We are discussion to use the more
reasonable version scheme 3.5.2.2 now, see
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2012-April/029263.html
If it goes well, we might try it for 3.5.3 release.
Best Regards,
Petr