I think by now we can skip discussing the statutes, because it does not seem to be about them. With the logic I see here, we could also say that TDF fosters proprietary standards and closed source, or selling space on the moon - we just use other words in the statutes.
I tried to engage with you on the matter you brought up, admitted things could be improved, but to no avail. With every message you send, the tone gets rougher and the accusations get more severe. You have been accusing various people repeatedly, in private and in public, you have shared private e-mails repeatedly despite people explicitly asking not to, and you always state an unknown “us”, but I don’t see people collectively supporting your harsh way of presenting things.
It is sad that you spend so much time and energy on such negative things, when we could use all of this to positively, constructively and jointly bring things forward, together.
It is very sad what happens here. What you do hurts people, it draws attention and energy, and it doesn’t advance anything.
I am always happy to engage in a discussion on things to be improved, but I am not open to being attacked in such way. If you want to have a sensible conversation, you know also how to reach me in private.
If you were consequent, you would agree that actually your behaviour is contrary to the rules I pointed out in the statutes, and take the respective actions. Please apply the standards you seek from others also to yourself.
This is also true for the meeting you held in Budapest. I see no recording, no written minutes, no report, nothing of it, although it is nearly two months past. Feel free to chose any of the words you used to attack others to describe your behaviour in this matter - otherwise it confirms the double standards you apply.