Hi Marina, all,
Marina Latini wrote:
No no, it makes sense to keep WollMux under the LibreOffice org, I agree. If
you are fine with the current status, can we start to work on WollMux?
I'd love to!
(Gabor is getting the last few handbook pages' existing German
translation put up on the wiki; and I'll see to get at least a basic
CI job setup going by early next week - but none of that should block
others from starting the work)
But, apart from WollMux... I think we could take this opportunity also for a
clean-up of repos in https://github.com/tdf.
You mentioned the DLP libraries, but libcmis is hosted under the TDF
organisation, and, if I'm not mistaken, the libraries from the DLP aren't
LibreOffice only but can be reused also elsewhere.
Yep, that's true - Calligra, Inkscape and Scribus use at least some of
Under the TDF organisation there are also other repos that should probably
be archived (but we are going semi off-topic now).
Also true, e.g. when looking at website stuff. BTW, 'archiving' on
github is something conceptually very close to our atticization - we
should evaluate setting the archive flag within that framework IMO.
We could also mention that we have the other LibreOffice organisation and
cross link from tdf to LibreOffice too.
Given that the main readme was misleading you, that's certainly useful.
But...for this clean-up, where we can continue this discussion? this list
doesn't look like the right place to me.
Doesn't feel terribly off-topic here (dev list would also not be a
100% on-topic match, neither website or marketing? - but for very
generic discussions, there's always the global discuss list of
Something else - does anybody see the need for a dedicated wollmux
mailing list? I didn't ask for one (and actually try to avoid silo-ed
low-traffic email lists, and nudge people onto the main dev list), but
not strictly against one either. The old wollmux project had one at
joinup IIRC, but it's dormant since a long time.