I guess you are referring to Thorsten stating the contrary of what the legal advice stated.
The legal advice has been transposed in votes, the link to the votes have been sent to the lawyer to check and the lawyer did not object to a single comma of those votes.
[PaoloVecchi]
The legal advice has been transposed in votes, the link to the votes
have been sent to the lawyer to check and the lawyer did not object to a single comma of those votes.
There is much more to say, that we canāt share here, on board discuss.
You know that.
So please stop trying to ādiscussā based on incomplete information in a
place where that should not be done.
Cor
How are we supposed to discuss the board-staff policy when topics that are relevant for this are not known to the general public? If we seek feedback from the general public, they should have the relevant information at hand?
Iām a bit lost how this process should work now.
The idea from the detailed process the board agreed upon, is to do that later and not in this particular topic.
I will ask my question there then.