+1 from me.
Paolo
Apologies for being late here, which such mail flood is hard to follow up every single thread.
+1 from my side
+1 also on Emiliano's comment.
Paolo
Hello,
The Board of Directors at the time of voting consists of 7 seat holders (not including deputies). In order to be quorate, the vote needs to have 1/2 or more of the Board of Directors members, which gives 4.
A total of 7 Board of Directors members have participated in the vote.
The vote is quorate.
A quorum could be reached with a simple majority of 4 votes.
Ask the marketing team to summarize the new LibreOffice Online information website (see vote item #1 in https://listarchives.tdf.io/i/4bCUE2Lh2ffa-M8da8zEfPF7) in the release notes, adding a link to the full page
Result of vote: 7 approvals, 0 abstain, 0 disapproval.
One deputy is in favor.
Decision: The proposal has been accepted.
Florian
Apologies for being late here, mail flood is hard to manage.
+1 from my side
Emiliano Vavassori 於 2021/2/5 下午9:26 寫道:
Hi,
I think it's pretty clear that several BoD members, me included, have
misunderstood the implication of such vote. Especially 1b. So, my take
is to vote on Guilhems proposal, detailed bellow. Which I support."rewind branches on https://git.libreoffice.org/online and for the time
being deny all write
operations to the repository, be it on the git or gerrit side. It'll
freeze the state of the dashboard, notification, and other clones for
free, and if/when we decide to accept contributions again everything
will be just one switch away."+1, but I think the proposal misses some bits. I'll try to cope with them:
* branches will be rewinded to commit (or the commits before)
4ca4fd34169dd386c2fa57bd28650c00b23d6864 (last commit before changes by
Collabora)
+1
* OpenGrok needs to point to the TDF git/gerrit
+1
* revert decision 1b and (if feasible) point TDF repo on GitHub on
git/gerrit on TDF infra.
+1
Hello,
"rewind branches onhttps://git.libreoffice.org/online and for the time
being deny all write
operations to the repository, be it on the git or gerrit side. It'll
freeze the state of the dashboard, notification, and other clones for
free, and if/when we decide to accept contributions again everything
will be just one switch away."+1, but I think the proposal misses some bits. I'll try to cope with them:
* branches will be rewinded to commit (or the commits before)
4ca4fd34169dd386c2fa57bd28650c00b23d6864 (last commit before changes by
Collabora)
* OpenGrok needs to point to the TDF git/gerrit
* revert decision 1b and (if feasible) point TDF repo on GitHub on
git/gerrit on TDF infra.After this bits, I think this whole votes needs another round of
confirmation - to be sure that also these bits are consensual.
quick vote reminder - please, everyone, give your vote on that extended vote, so we can finalize this pending decision as well.
Thanks,
Florian
Sorry, thought I already did answer in this vote, but there were some remarks from Emiliano, so:
Still +1 also for the clarification of Emiliano throughout,
because with the latest infos from Guilhem and as we then do not have another tooling / play ground in TDF for acquiring new contributors this makes sense to me.
Best Lothar
Am 05.02.2021 um 14:26 schrieb Emiliano Vavassori:
Il 02/02/21 18:10, Daniel Armando Rodriguez ha scritto:Hi, I think it's pretty clear that several BoD members, me included, have misunderstood the implication of such vote. Especially 1b. So, my take is to vote on Guilhems proposal, detailed bellow. Which I support. "rewind branches on [https://git.libreoffice.org/online](https://git.libreoffice.org/online) and for the time being deny all write operations to the repository, be it on the git or gerrit side. It'll freeze the state of the dashboard, notification, and other clones for free, and if/when we decide to accept contributions again everything will be just one switch away."+1, but I think the proposal misses some bits. I'll try to cope with them: * branches will be rewinded to commit (or the commits before) 4ca4fd34169dd386c2fa57bd28650c00b23d6864 (last commit before changes by Collabora) * OpenGrok needs to point to the TDF git/gerrit * revert decision 1b and (if feasible) point TDF repo on GitHub on git/gerrit on TDF infra. After this bits, I think this whole votes needs another round of confirmation - to be sure that also these bits are consensual. Cheers,
Hi Emiliano,
* revert decision 1b and (if feasible) point TDF repo on GitHub on
git/gerrit on TDF infra.
Other BoD members are already voting on this but I have trouble understanding
what that means. From https://listarchives.tdf.io/i/gVuesWC6ZI0MUequqiqJ3nrc
1b. to switch the https://github.com/libreoffice/online mirror to
instead mirror the Collabora repo, for the time being, and make sure we
catch pull requests there, e.g. via the mentoring alias on TDF side
Before that https://github.com/libreoffice/online was a read-only mirror
for https://git.libreoffice.org/online , so by “revert decision 1b” I
guess you mean to make it so again? Should both this and
https://listarchives.tdf.io/i/IbatXLjaK38BCbLBNiiw7Ned be approved, this
would mean that the tip of the master branch on both
https://git.libreoffice.org/online and https://github.com/libreoffice/online
would point to 4ca4fd34169dd386c2fa57bd28650c00b23d6864^. (As was the
case between the Oct 1 and the implementation of the aforementioned BoD
decision.)
But what do you mean by the second part of your proposal: “(if feasible)
point TDF repo on GitHub on git/gerrit on TDF infra”? I can't think of
an interpretation that's not already covered by “revert decision 1b”.
Cheers
Thanks for writing that down. And fine for me.
We all see it as an intermediate state, and want to work on 'the future' 
Cheers,
Cor
Before that https://github.com/libreoffice/online was a read-only mirror
for https://git.libreoffice.org/online , so by “revert decision 1b” I
guess you mean to make it so again? Should both this and
https://listarchives.tdf.io/i/IbatXLjaK38BCbLBNiiw7Ned be approved, this
would mean that the tip of the master branch on both
https://git.libreoffice.org/online and https://github.com/libreoffice/online
would point to 4ca4fd34169dd386c2fa57bd28650c00b23d6864^. (As was the
case between the Oct 1 and the implementation of the aforementioned BoD
decision.)
That's exactly what I propose, in a much richer and precise description.
But what do you mean by the second part of your proposal: “(if feasible)
point TDF repo on GitHub on git/gerrit on TDF infra”? I can't think of
an interpretation that's not already covered by “revert decision 1b”.
Indeed. The second part of the phrase was only meant to explicitly state
what is going to happen in the end (including the technical clearance to
do it). "Revert decision 1b" should be quite clear by itself.
As stated (elsewhere), I intend these modifications as a temporary way
until a definitive and shared way will be decided by the Board.
Cheers,
But what do you mean by the second part of your proposal: “(if feasible)
point TDF repo on GitHub on git/gerrit on TDF infra”? I can't think of
an interpretation that's not already covered by “revert decision 1b”.Indeed. The second part of the phrase was only meant to explicitly state
what is going to happen in the end (including the technical clearance to
do it). "Revert decision 1b" should be quite clear by itself.
Ack, thanks for clarifying! Part of the confusion was that some of you
voted in favor of 1b then in favor of reverting it, but well I guess
everyone is allowed to change their opinion
As stated (elsewhere), I intend these modifications as a temporary way
until a definitive and shared way will be decided by the Board.
Thank you for spelling this out.
Hello,
The Board of Directors at the time of voting consists of 7 seat holders (not including deputies). In order to be quorate, the vote needs to have 1/2 or more of the Board of Directors members, which gives 4.
A total of 7 Board of Directors members have participated in the vote.
The vote is quorate.
A quorum could be reached with a simple majority of 4 votes.
"rewind branches onhttps://git.libreoffice.org/online and for the time
being deny all write
operations to the repository, be it on the git or gerrit side. It'll
freeze the state of the dashboard, notification, and other clones for
free, and if/when we decide to accept contributions again everything
will be just one switch away."+1, but I think the proposal misses some bits. I'll try to cope with them:
* branches will be rewinded to commit (or the commits before)
4ca4fd34169dd386c2fa57bd28650c00b23d6864 (last commit before changes by
Collabora)
Result of vote: 6 approvals, 1 abstain, 0 disapprovals.
One deputy is in favor.
Decision: The proposal has been accepted.
* OpenGrok needs to point to the TDF git/gerrit
Result of vote: 6 approvals, 1 abstain, 0 disapprovals.
One deputy is in favor.
Decision: The proposal has been accepted.
* revert decision 1b and (if feasible) point TDF repo on GitHub on
git/gerrit on TDF infra.
Result of vote: 5 approvals, 1 abstain, 1 disapproval.
One deputy is in favor.
Decision: The proposal has been accepted.
Florian